| A New Approach: Solutions for ED Crowding | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
REU Increases Capacity By Doubling Bed Capacity
|
|||||||||
![]() |
Traditional EDBuilt for a flat-line average volume of 50K patients per year with 26 beds. |
Daily Peak Volume Assures FailureFor 12 hours per day the ED runs as if it is a 74K patient ED and fails every single day. | ![]() |
![]() |
Traditional ED DesignTo meet peak capacity needs the ED would need 50% more ED beds to cope with actual volume in ED at a cost of about $20M. |
REU Increases ED Capacity with Many Fewer BedsImplementation of REU doubles the capacity of traditional ED bed for the walk-in patients. In this model it accommodates the peak volume with the addition of only 4 beds (cost of $4-5M). Focus on Process, Design, Implementation and Maintenance | ![]() |